The European Union (EU) have recently banned the
use of penta- and octa- bromodiphenyl ether. These are in the
group of flame retardants known as polybrominated diphenyl ethers
(PBDEs). Is this the right decision?
Risk combines hazard and probability.
BFRs may have health hazards but they also reduce the chance of
fires.
Which is the most important?
How much extra would you be prepared pay to replace PBDEs with
other flame retardants?
Ban
Continue to
use
BFRs have been found in breast milk, human
tissues and even in the oceans. They could
cause unknown damage to health and the
environment.
The research has not shown any direct effects
on humans. There just is not the evidence
that BFRs cause harm.
Alternatives to the use of BFRs are available
and do not cause the same problems.
BFRs are very good flame retardants. They
have saved thousands of lives throughout
the world. Alternatives simply are not
as effective.
The use of BFRs is risky. It is better to
be cautious and ban their use.
The benefits of BFRs are much greater than
the possible risks.
Should Brominated flame retardants be banned or not?